why does the algorithm still work even though we don't rotate our vector values based on flow? wouldn't we trace in wrong directions?
CardiacMangoes
Is this lagrangian V-T (potential minus kinetic energy)? If so, can deriving the hamiltonian of naiver-stokes provide more computationally efficient solutions? In a hamiltonian's graphical representation we can view its phase space to understand how the system will evolve given initial conditions. Hamiltonian space would also give a quantitative measurement for Δt that is a heuristic for efficient simulation in euler's method.
joeyzhao123
Can someone explain the "vector values should be rotated based on flow, but most people don't do this." Why do most people not?
why does the algorithm still work even though we don't rotate our vector values based on flow? wouldn't we trace in wrong directions?
Is this lagrangian V-T (potential minus kinetic energy)? If so, can deriving the hamiltonian of naiver-stokes provide more computationally efficient solutions? In a hamiltonian's graphical representation we can view its phase space to understand how the system will evolve given initial conditions. Hamiltonian space would also give a quantitative measurement for Δt that is a heuristic for efficient simulation in euler's method.
Can someone explain the "vector values should be rotated based on flow, but most people don't do this." Why do most people not?