Would someone like to make the case for one approach or the other?
kkkhanl
The first one seems more memory efficient as you wouldn't need to keep track of each of the smaller super-sampled points for the rest of the triangles as well. But I'm wondering if the second case would make more sense if the triangles are close enough to each other that the edges will interact with each other.
Would someone like to make the case for one approach or the other?
The first one seems more memory efficient as you wouldn't need to keep track of each of the smaller super-sampled points for the rest of the triangles as well. But I'm wondering if the second case would make more sense if the triangles are close enough to each other that the edges will interact with each other.