Could someone explain what M and M_1, M_2, M_3 all are meant to represent?
Gabe-Mitnick
I think the bold letters a,b,c,d to the right are not related to the italic a,b,c,d elements of the matrix M. The bold equations are saying this: Say you have a point a and transform it by some matrix M1 to get a point b, and then transform b by some matrix M2 to get a point c, etc. Then you can compose those three transformations into one matrix M=M1M2M3, whose effect is the same as applying the three transformations in order. So you could transform point a directly to point d by multiplying by that combined matrix M. Overall, it means that composing transformations is equivalent to matrix multiplication, and both of them are associative (but not commutative).
Staffjamesfobrien
Yes, the bold variables are distinct from the scalars. I can see how that might be confusing!
Could someone explain what M and M_1, M_2, M_3 all are meant to represent?
I think the bold letters a,b,c,d to the right are not related to the italic a,b,c,d elements of the matrix M. The bold equations are saying this: Say you have a point a and transform it by some matrix M1 to get a point b, and then transform b by some matrix M2 to get a point c, etc. Then you can compose those three transformations into one matrix M=M1M2M3, whose effect is the same as applying the three transformations in order. So you could transform point a directly to point d by multiplying by that combined matrix M. Overall, it means that composing transformations is equivalent to matrix multiplication, and both of them are associative (but not commutative).
Yes, the bold variables are distinct from the scalars. I can see how that might be confusing!