Ren said that the shape we see in the spatial domain is faster varying in Y and slower varying in X so the amount of energy will be closer in X, but to me it also seems that the spatial domain and frequency domain are inversely related in geometry. Is that a risky assumption to make to examples later in the course? I feel like because the shape we see is wider in X, the function has more time to gradually change through X and reach its max energy, which means a smaller range of frequency change and thus a smaller width in frequency.
Ren said that the shape we see in the spatial domain is faster varying in Y and slower varying in X so the amount of energy will be closer in X, but to me it also seems that the spatial domain and frequency domain are inversely related in geometry. Is that a risky assumption to make to examples later in the course? I feel like because the shape we see is wider in X, the function has more time to gradually change through X and reach its max energy, which means a smaller range of frequency change and thus a smaller width in frequency.