Since the left picture has a shallow depth of field, is it a typo that the left picture was taken with f/4 instead of f/11? Sorry if this was covered in person.
jenzou
To minos-cs184: I don't think this is a typo. The slide before this also compares depths of field, where the blurrier background (shallow depth of field) image has aperture f/4 and the clearer images have smaller apertures f/11 and f/32. This is similar to the example in this slide, where the blurrier background image has larger aperture f/4 and the clearer background image has smaller aperture f/11.
jenzou
Larger aperture means smaller shutter time for the same amount of exposure, which produces blurrier background (shallow depth of field), so this means N in A=Nf is smaller (and less motion blur, which applies more to example on previous slide and not this slide).
Since the left picture has a shallow depth of field, is it a typo that the left picture was taken with f/4 instead of f/11? Sorry if this was covered in person.
To minos-cs184: I don't think this is a typo. The slide before this also compares depths of field, where the blurrier background (shallow depth of field) image has aperture f/4 and the clearer images have smaller apertures f/11 and f/32. This is similar to the example in this slide, where the blurrier background image has larger aperture f/4 and the clearer background image has smaller aperture f/11.
Larger aperture means smaller shutter time for the same amount of exposure, which produces blurrier background (shallow depth of field), so this means N in A=Nf is smaller (and less motion blur, which applies more to example on previous slide and not this slide).
Smaller aperture gives the opposite result.